Citation:
Williams PG, Grafenauer SJ, O'Shea JE. Cereal grains, legumes, and weight management: a comprehensive review of the scientific evidence. Nutr Rev. 2008 Apr;66(4):171-82.
PubMed ID: 18366531
Study Design:
Systematic Review
Class:
M -
Click here for explanation of classification scheme.
Research Design and Implementation Rating:

POSITIVE: See Research Design and Implementation Criteria Checklist below.
Research Purpose:
To assess the evidence about the role of grains and legumes in the prevention and management of overweight and obesity, to ensure health messages are evidence-based and consistent with the best research available.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Published in English
- Human studies
- Anthropometric outcome measures reported
Exclusion Criteria:
- Original data not reported
- Only intermediate markers examined rather than direct measures of overweight and obesity
- Studies with a low quality rating, using methods and criteria of the European Heart Network, generally because they lacked control groups or the methods were inadequately described or validated
Description of Study Protocol:
Recruitment
Literature search:
- Databases searched: PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Cinhal, Science Direct
- Dates included: 1980 - 2005
- Search terms: cereal, grain, wholegrain, legume, pulse, bread, pasta, rice, wheat, barley, oat, rye, soy, bean, pea in conjunction with obesity, overweight, satiety, BMI, waist
- References in identified papers also examined
- Relevant studies assessed for scientific quality using the methods and criteria described by the European Heart Network
Design: Comprehensive, systematic review
Blinding used (if applicable): not applicable
Intervention (if applicable): not applicable
Statistical Analysis: not completed
Data Collection Summary:
Timing of Measurements: not applicable
Dependent Variables
- Body mass index (BMI)
- Weight
- Waist circumference (WC)
- Waist-hip ratio (WHR)
Independent Variables
- Grain intake - as part of a dietary pattern or individual grain foods, including whole grain versus refined grains
- Legume intake
Control Variables
Description of Actual Data Sample:
Initial N:
- Number of abstracts identified for review: N = 556
- Number directly relevant to topic: N = 121
Attrition (final N): Number of eligible studies after exclusion: N = 53
Age: not mentioned
Ethnicity: not mentioned
Other relevant demographics
Anthropometrics
Location: Authors - Australia
Summary of Results:
Key Findings
- There is good evidence from epidemiological and intervention studies that
- a diet high in whole grains is associated with lower BMI;
- a diet high in whole grains and legumes can help reduce weight gain; and
- significant weight loss is achievable with energy-controlled diets that are high in cereals and legumes
- There is weak evidence that high intakes of refined grains may cause small increases in WC in women.
- There is no evidence that low-carbohydrate diets that restrict cereal intake offer long-term advantages for sustained weight loss.
- There is insufficient evidence to make clear conclusions about the protective effect of legumes on weight.
Epidemiological studies
Studies that analyzed dietary patterns (using principal components analysis or cluster analysis)
- Most studies found an association between a prudent dietary pattern with higher levels of cereals and legumes with lower measures of overweight, supporting recommendations to include these foods in a healthy diet
- studies do not provide a clear consensus on
- role of bread specifically
- differing aspects of whole-grain versus refined cereals
- dose-response data about the relationship
- 10 studies found patterns that included higher intakes of whole grains to be associated with lower measures of obesity.
- studies included both male and female subjects, age ranges = 8 to 87 years, in 12 different countries
- one study found no association between BMI and quintiles of conformance to prudent diet with high intake of whole grains and legumes (Health Professionals Follow-up Study)
Cross-sectional studies
- Studies are consistent overall in demonstrating that higher intakes of whole-grain cereals and legumes are associated with lower BMI, WC and risk of overweight.
- 1 major study showed a slight higher WHR (But not BMI) with higher consumption of refined grains
- 3 other studies did not support that finding
Longitudinal studies of weight change
- Overall, results of longitudinal studies of weight change are somewhat inconsistent
- Most studies have found an inverse relationship between whole-grain intake and weight gain
- There is limited evidence in relation to legume intake.
- A few studies found that higher intakes of refined grains appeared to be associated with increases in WC and BMI in women (weight changes < 0.7 kg over a 12 year period, statistically significant)
- No studies were found that examined the association of high and low glycemic index grain consumption with body weight
Intervention studies
- There are few well-controlled studies that have specifically examined the effect of higher intakes of cereals and legumes on weight reduction or maintenance in the long-term, or compared the effects of refined- and whole-grain cereals specifically.
- Studies provide consistent evidence that weight loss is still achievable in diets that are high in cereals, especially the whole-grain variety
- 17 intervention studies identified
- 11 directly reported changes in weight or WC
- Only a few (~4) studies reported a better rate of weight loss when the grain intake of the diet was increased.
- All other studies demonstrated that a diet with high cereal content can support weight control, although most did not find a superior rate of weight loss when compared to diets with lower cereal intake levels.
Other Findings
Low carbohydrate diets
- 6 studies since 2003 have compared conventional and low-carbohydrate diets; duration = 3 to 12 months
- over 6 months, slightly better weight loss (differences of 3.8 - 5.8 kg) reported with low-carbohydrate diet
- after twelve months, the difference lost significance in those studies that followed participants longer

Author Conclusion:
This research provides strong support for continuing messages to the public that a diet high in whole-grain cereals and legumes will support good overall health and is likely to help maintain a healthy body weight.
Reviewer Comments:
|
Research Design and Implementation Criteria Checklist: Review Articles
|
|
Relevance Questions
|
| |
1.
|
Will the answer if true, have a direct bearing on the health of patients? |
Yes
|
| |
2.
|
Is the outcome or topic something that patients/clients/population groups would care about? |
Yes
|
| |
3.
|
Is the problem addressed in the review one that is relevant to nutrition or dietetics practice? |
Yes
|
| |
4.
|
Will the information, if true, require a change in practice? |
Yes
|
| |
|
Validity Questions
|
| |
1.
|
Was the question for the review clearly focused and appropriate? |
Yes
|
| |
2.
|
Was the search strategy used to locate relevant studies comprehensive? Were the databases searched and the search termsused described? |
Yes
|
| |
3.
|
Were explicit methods used to select studies to include in the review? Were inclusion/exclusion criteria specified and appropriate? Were selection methods unbiased? |
Yes
|
| |
4.
|
Was there an appraisal of the quality and validity of studies included in the review? Were appraisal methods specified, appropriate, and reproducible? |
Yes
|
| |
5.
|
Were specific treatments/interventions/exposures described? Were treatments similar enough to be combined? |
Yes
|
| |
6.
|
Was the outcome of interest clearly indicated? Were other potential harms and benefits considered? |
Yes
|
| |
7.
|
Were processes for data abstraction, synthesis, and analysis described? Were they applied consistently across studies and groups? Was there appropriate use of qualitative and/or quantitative synthesis? Was variation in findings among studies analyzed? Were heterogeneity issued considered? If data from studies were aggregated for meta-analysis, was the procedure described? |
Yes
|
| |
8.
|
Are the results clearly presented in narrative and/or quantitative terms? If summary statistics are used, are levels of significance and/or confidence intervals included? |
Yes
|
| |
9.
|
Are conclusions supported by results with biases and limitations taken into consideration? Are limitations of the review identified and discussed? |
Yes
|
| |
10.
|
Was bias due to the review’s funding or sponsorship unlikely? |
Yes
|
| |
| |
Copyright American Dietetic Association (ADA).